Tuesday 1 February 2011

A Pile Of Bricks







We lie together, huddled in the dust,
as boys and girls and chimney sweepers must.
From such abasement we will never rise,
but in our day we won the Turner Prize.








Equivalent VIII, usually referred to as "The Bricks", is the last and most famous of a series of minimalist sculpture by Carl Andre. Constructed in 1966, it was bought by The Tate Gallery in 1972. The exhibit comprises one-hundred-and-twenty fire bricks, arranged in two layers, in a six-by-ten rectangle. All eight structures in the series have the same height, mass and volume, but different shapes. Thus they are all "equivalent".

When first exhibited at the Tate Gallery at Millbank in 1976, the piece drew much criticism in the press because of the perception that taxpayers' money had been spent on paying an inflated price for a collection of bricks.



Quotation:

"Golden lads and girls all must,
As chimney-sweepers come to dust."


Cymbeline
Shakespeare

35 comments:

  1. Solid post.

    Solid as well made old bricks!



    Aloha from Honolulu
    Comfort Spiral

    ><}}(°>


    <°)}}><

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonderful, Friko.
    When I first saw the photo of the bricks, I knew somewhere in the back of my head there was an appropriate Shakespeare quotation, but I just couldn't bring it to the fore. So glad you knew it.
    -- K

    Kay, Alberta, Canada
    An Unfittie's Guide to Adventurous Travel

    ReplyDelete
  3. A Turner, you say? Minimilist still around? I like Will's concept best of all..
    this was very wry!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't really understand or appreciate his form of art, either, but realize there are people who do and I am happy the government recognizes they should not fund only the art of which they approve. That's what the Nazi's did.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Really liked this one, Friko. I studied aesthetics for a year at University, and I still don't 'get' some works. But, I'm with Jen, it takes all to make a world.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yep, art is in the eye of the beholder and in the vision of the artist.

    ReplyDelete
  7. nice...love the verse you open with...its all art you just got to find the perspective...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Like your verse better than the 'art.'

    ReplyDelete
  9. Friko - I learned so much from this post. Wonderful :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm with Vickie. I do not see any art in this. I think the people were conned. I never understood the Andy Warhol tomato soup cans painting either.

    ReplyDelete
  11. How interesting. I would love to tour this gallery some day. I can understand the mixed reviews by critics.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'd rather use the bricks to build something...great post.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Shakespeare and minimalism, together in a mere 4 lines. Brava!

    ReplyDelete
  14. They look like 1950s London , actually . And this generation , reared in Philippe Starcke sleekness , will view them in museums , rather the way we gawp at Byzantine artifacts .

    ReplyDelete
  15. Interesting art - beauty is definitely in the eye of the beholder, interesting take on the prompt.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I can't tell you how disappointed I was earlier this year when I discovered that I was now too old to be eligible for the Turner Prize!

    I had forgotten about this piece - maybe it needs to be viewed with the other 7 pieces in the series to be fully appreciated?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I grew up with "modern" art, I studied art for a while with a practitioner of minimalist art. I think I understand what minimalist art is getting at, and yet, and yet, is it possible that the emperor is really naked?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Great post. The Shakespeare wraps it up nicely.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hmm, I can't pretend I understand art. I just like it, or I don't. But I do not understand the price of some art. Although, if someone is willing to pay a certain amount, it must be worth it I guess. How does one determine the value of an idea?

    ReplyDelete
  20. A magnificent job of research
    and art appreciation; snappy,
    demure, haiku-like.
    I had not heard of Carl Andre
    before; thanks for the heads up.
    I remember seeing a photo of
    Picasso's "The Bull", and I said
    to a companion, "Hell, that is
    just some bicycle handlebars,
    and some other junk. I could
    have done that." and she said,
    "Yeah, but you didn't and he did."

    ReplyDelete
  21. I see the photo of the top bricks as art, but not the "sculpture". Wonderful poem and interesting background info, though. Thanks! And thanks for stopping by my place!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Simple art in strange minds. Personally, I would have preferred the bricks in a heap! I'm used to chaos!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes, brilliant use of Shakespeare.

    Did you know that Andre's wife, Ana Mendieta, was an artist, that she created impressions of her body in earth and other organic materials, and that she died by falling 34 stories to the segmented sidewalk below? Carl Andre was tried and acquitted of her murder.

    (I'm one of those weirdos who likes his art)

    ReplyDelete
  24. Provocative post, to be sure. I love your post - it sings of 'to each his own'!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lovely verse, and an interesting story. I'd never heard of these. Thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I never become tired of the question "What is art?" I can argue either side of it with absolute ease, especially after a glass or two of wine.

    ReplyDelete
  27. über Kunst lässt sich streiten. Für manche Dinge habe ich einfach keinen Sinn... Sorry!
    Dir einen wunderschönen Tag, liebe Friko!

    Renée

    ReplyDelete
  28. I don't value it ,
    but I value that someone else might.

    ReplyDelete
  29. you are always interesting
    I too learned much from this magpie
    was it worth the taxpayers paying for it
    nah..but is it art..sure why not

    ReplyDelete
  30. Love the minimalist concepts... art... hmmm...

    ReplyDelete
  31. i guess i'm a funny sort. i prefer the close-up shot of the texture of the bricks to the sculpture. but this is one of the great things about all things creative, so many different forms to appeal to so many tastes.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Okay, I am going to be the barbarian. I like the shot of the brick walk which is beginning to look like mine, or I should say, mine is looking like yours? I don't care for the "stack of bricks" and cannot be talked into liking it either. All I can think of is how the tax dollars could have been better spent.

    I do like the quatrain, which cannot be Shakespeare as he lived long before Turner began to paint. I suspect one of the Victorian poets penned this verse, or perhaps Friko did it?
    Anyway, the couplet at the end is defintely the Bard. Dianne

    ReplyDelete
  33. It took me till I was in my fifties before I started to really think when I looked at modern art. Your post, quote and the comments help to further me along, as it were.

    ReplyDelete
  34. positive and fun perspective of the bricks.
    cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Has anybody read "The Emperor's New Clothes"?...

    ReplyDelete

Comments are good, I like to know what you think of my posts. I know you'll keep it civil.